Heimo Truhetz in #10: INT2LM on January 11 (#10238de)

in #10: INT2LM

<p> if I take the numbers <br/> dx=2.7499998915251962E-002 <br/> lonll=-32.794998168945312 <br/> latll=-9.4610004425048828 <br/> lonll+dx*(0:60) <br/> latll+dx*(0:60) <br/> <br/> I get as possible values: <br/> -8.113500 -8.086000 -8.058500 <br/> and <br/> -31.4475 -31.4200 -31.3925 -31.3650 -31.3375 -31.3100 <br/> <br/> so the startlat_tot values you tried may be wrong? </p>

  @rolfzentek in #539ecb8

<p> if I take the numbers <br/> dx=2.7499998915251962E-002 <br/> lonll=-32.794998168945312 <br/> latll=-9.4610004425048828 <br/> lonll+dx*(0:60) <br/> latll+dx*(0:60) <br/> <br/> I get as possible values: <br/> -8.113500 -8.086000 -8.058500 <br/> and <br/> -31.4475 -31.4200 -31.3925 -31.3650 -31.3375 -31.3100 <br/> <br/> so the startlat_tot values you tried may be wrong? </p>
RZ replied

if I take the numbers
dx=2.7499998915251962E-002
lonll=-32.794998168945312
latll=-9.4610004425048828
lonll+dx*(0:60)
latll+dx*(0:60)

I get as possible values:
-8.113500 -8.086000 -8.058500
and
-31.4475 -31.4200 -31.3925 -31.3650 -31.3375 -31.3100

so the startlat_tot values you tried may be wrong?

View in channel